This white paper explores organizational responses to test misconduct, and how credentialing organizations can take a process-driven and methodical approach to responding to both routine and significant test misconduct.
In this session, we will discuss issues and challenges that are typically encountered when moving from a mono-linguistic exam to a poly-linguistic model. Issues related to test development, score equivalence, and psychometric considerations will be addressed.
This white paper will discuss the basics of U.S. copyright law, copyright protection of traditional standardized tests, copyright protection of pool-based tests, and the U.S. Copyright Office’s (“Office”) 2017 interim rules governing the secure test application process.
This paper reports the design and results of interviews with individuals who have experience working with small programs. The questions encourage the respondents to help identify both the organizational and psychometric issues they face with small programs.
The goal of this white paper is to discuss and suggest categories of evidence to document the testing components of a credentialing program and to provide examples of what types of information to include, so programs can avoid this conundrum.
Representatives from two organizations will share their unique approaches on how to utilize mentors for item reviewers. Learn strategies on how to develop and implement your own mentor program to support your item writers.
To help credentialing organizations and leaders learn these essential principles and how they align with standards, we are pleased to provide this one-day workshop on the fundamentals of psychometrics and the assessment life cycle. The workshop will provide the opportunity to participate in a practi
This on-demand webinar will discuss each approach and highlight the policies and procedures organizations use to deter, detect, and decide how to manage test security breaches across the testing lifecycle, putting you in a more informed position to choose which approach is right for your program.
A panel of experts in technology enhanced assessment lead an engaging and interactive discussion that highlight issues, challenges, and solutions in the application of technology for the design and delivery of credentialing exams.
This white paper focuses on exam security for high-stakes exams. Throughout, the authors provide practical business-related considerations for addressing the increasingly complex landscape that assessment organizations face today as they seek to securely navigate the internet.
Remote proctoring continues to be discussed extensively in certification, with many questions abounding. This on-demand webinar provides information on the types of remote proctoring available, the pros and cons of remote proctoring, and lessons learned in implementation.
Hear a complete overview of standard setting methods that are used in various assessment settings. Learn the practical aspects of selecting and training a group of Subject Matter Experts, and how to communicate standard setting results to both the governing body as well as the candidates.
The Measuring Non-cognitive Competence Report Task Force was assembled to inform the ICE community on the topic of noncognitive assessment and its relevance to professional credentialing. To this end, this questions and answers document is provided to serve as an initial introduction and to provide references for those interested in a deeper dive into the underlying literature.
This on-demand webinar provides a focused introduction to computerized adaptive testing (CAT), allowing credentialing professionals to better understand the benefits of the approach and evaluate its applicability to their organization.
Designed for new credentialing staff, new volunteer board members, or staff who are developing a new certification program, set up your staff and volunteers for success by providing them basic knowledge and good practices for administering a certification program.
This publication summarizes current principles related to performance examinations and accepted methods for their development, validation, and use. It is an update to Guidelines for Non-Written Examinations, published by the National Commission for Certifying Agencies (NCCA) in January 1991.
In 2010 ICE conducted a large scale job analysis, the first in the field, to identify the responsibilities and duties of the credentialing professional. The study consists of the following major phases, which provide the organization of this report: 1) Initial Development and Validation 2) Pilot Study 3) Validation Study, and, 4) Development of Specifications.
The Psychometric Concepts and Analyses module from the Fundamental Topics in Certification online course explains basic psychometric principles and examines the type of analyses used to evaluate the quality of a certification candidate.
The Assessment Development and Delivery module from the Fundamental Topics in Certification online course reviews the major steps in developing fair and accurate assessments and how to best administer these assessments based on the nature of the program.
his 2011 white paper, authored by Timothy Muckle, PhD, will explore a number of facets of the foray into the development of innovative item formats by one credentialing organization (National Board of Certification and Recertification for Nurse Anesthetists, or NBCRNA).
In addition to summarizing the implementation of alternative item types, the paper will discuss overall benefits of the project, with a particular focus on value added to the credential, as well as lessons learned and recommendations for decision-making for other organizations.
This package offers you recordings of 12 concurrent sessions (1 hour each) from the 2013 ICE Excahgne that focus on testing concepts and issues for certification programs. Most sessions are suitable for all levels of credentialing professionals in both the public and private sectors.
This webcast will discuss ways to identify discussions or disclosure of exam content on the internet. Heather Mullen & Aimée Hobby Rhodes will review an approach to positively identify the individuals who have posted the exam content and how to determine the manner in which the information was gathered.
ICE's Research & Development (R&D) committee noted the limited guidance and resources available on how to set eligibility requirements. To meet this need, the committee conducted interviews with existing certification programs, completed a thorough review of the topic, and produced the Eligibility Requirements Report. The report provides a glimpse of industry perspectives and best practices, alongside a review of the policies in place for determining credential eligibility and the methods for setting and changing these requirements.
The "Credentialing Specialist" Assessment-based Certificate Program is designed for certification staff who want to gain insights into the eco-system of certification from a program's conception, through its development and delivery, to maintenance and improvement.
Your job analysis plays a critical part in the test development and administration decisions that you make. Learn the information you could collect in your job analysis to help set your cutoff scores, particularly for content valid tests.
Consider the pros and cons of each setting, and identify programmatic considerations (goals, budget, resources, etc.) that should factor in to the decision to develop test items in-person or in the virtual environment.
What is a job analysis and why do we do them? Hear an overview of the process of conducting a job analysis including the purpose behind the activities, what the law has to say about it, and what methods can be used.
A case study is provided that documents the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) exam’s transition to a three-option item format. The CFA program is the gold standard credential among investment professionals globally, with 124,000 CFA charterholders residing in 145 countries. This case study is intended to be of value to other testing programs considering a similar change with respect to understanding the motivation for change, the challenges faced with stakeholders and constituents, and the psychometric impacts of change that align with literature-based expectations.
The 2015 ICE Exchange concurrent session, A Game Plan for Managing Test Security Incidents, provides a case study approach to introduce a security incident response framework and a flow chart to help navigate game-changing test security incidents.
The 2015 ICE Exchange concurrent session, Considering Online Proctoring? Tips, Guidelines, & Lessons Learned, shares insights on the psychometric, policy and standards, product feature, privacy, and security aspects of the decision to use online (remote) proctoring.
Learn how to take a proactive approach to including security in communications before, during, and after the test experience; analyze current communications (e.g., handbooks, candidate agreements) for security language; and present examples. The presentation will take an in-depth look at the steps to achieve these objectives by exam vendors and sponsors.
This on-demand webinar outlines the key considerations for programs that are thinking about implementing remote proctoring. Leave armed with sufficient insight into the benefits, drawbacks, and challenges of remote proctoring to determine if it is worth further consideration.
Learn the basics of how to build a strong security plan from the ground-up, provide recommendations for prioritizing limited budget resources, and offer advice for maintenance of your security plan as your program grows.
The concurrent session, Lost In Translation: Facilitating The Conversation Between Psychometricians and Non-Psychometricians, provides a framework for understanding and resolving conflicting program priorities, and illustrates a way to create a common understanding so all stakeholders can work together for the betterment of the program.
This concurrent session, Establishing and Maintaining Firewalls Between Certification and Education, presents the five most frequent problem areas with applications for initial and continuing accreditation under the NCCA Standards for the Accreditation of Certification, and is based on the ICE white paper with the same title.
The Online Proctoring: Dipping Your Toes or Cannon Balling - It's Time to Jump In concurrent session shares a framework for navigating security/privacy risks; an understanding psychometric considerations, candidate reactions, and NCCA’s perspective on this emerging delivery format; and some key decision points before “jumping” into online proctoring.
This Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE) white paper provides insight into how one testing organization—the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB)—created a strong SME culture with low turnover and high engagement at all levels. This paper presents a case study, but is also intended to provide a set of conceptual tools for organizations interested in creating not only a sense of investment among their SMEs but also a sense of group cohesion and overall program continuity.
Explore the cognitive level schemes and how the various levels are applicable to item writing and discuss ways to guide item writers in developing higher order questions. By the end of the on-demand webinar, know two strategies to improve the quality of your items.